Skills-Based Hiring Is Growing, But So Is Hiring Friction

A closeup of a desk where two individuals in suits sit across from each other with their faces out of frame. In front of one is a resume while the other has his hands folded over a note book with a laptop to the left hand side.

Skills-based hiring was supposed to make hiring more precise.

Instead, for many organizations, it’s made hiring feel slower.

Companies are moving away from default degree requirements and pedigree filters toward demonstrated impact and measurable skills.

At the same time, 55% of employers plan to increase contract staffing, and temporary jobs rose by 9,100 in the latest labor report — reinforcing a growing “try before you buy” approach.

The strategy makes sense.

But strategy is moving faster than process.

As job descriptions are rewritten, roles are redefined, and expectations shift, hiring friction is rising — for employers and candidates alike.

This isn’t a reversal of skills-based hiring. It’s the messy middle of a major hiring transition.

What Is Skills-Based Hiring?

Skills-based hiring is a recruitment strategy that prioritizes demonstrated hard skills, soft skills, and measurable impact over traditional credentials like a college degree or job title.

Instead of filtering candidates by a bachelor’s degree or years of experience alone, employers evaluate whether someone can actually perform the work required — often using skills tests, structured interview questions, and competency-based job descriptions.

In theory, this approach widens the talent pipeline and focuses on capability rather than pedigree.

In practice, it requires organizations to rethink how they define roles, assess talent, and manage the future of work.

The Shift to Skills-Based Hiring Is Real

Degrees Are Losing Their Default Status

For decades, a college degree — often a bachelor’s degree — acted as a default filter in candidate screening. It created what many now call a “paper ceiling,” limiting opportunity for candidates who were skilled through alternative routes, including community college, workforce training programs, certifications, or direct work experience.

Today, more organizations are removing strict degree requirements from job descriptions and moving toward a skills-first approach.

Employers are focusing on:

Demonstrated impact over pedigree
Potential-focused hiring over rigid resume checklists
Soft skills like adaptability and communication alongside hard skills

In theory, this shift levels the playing field and opens doors to more diverse talent.

But theory and execution aren’t always aligned.

Why Job Descriptions Are Being Rewritten

Nearly 65% of employers report rewriting job postings.

Why?

Because a traditional job description built around responsibilities and degree requirements doesn’t support a skills-based approach.

Organizations are now attempting to:

Move from task lists to outcome-based job profiling
Create competency-based job descriptions
Define measurable skills instead of vague qualifications
Align job postings with updated recruitment strategy

This is a major hiring change — and it’s affecting pipeline quality.

When job descriptions are unclear or poorly structured, candidate experience suffers. Strong talent hesitates. The wrong applicants apply. The talent pipeline becomes harder to manage.

Why Hiring Feels Slower Right Now

The slowdown many teams are feeling isn’t random.

It’s structural.

Transparency Expectations Are Higher

Candidates today expect clarity. They want to know:

Is the role permanent or contract?
What is the salary range?
What does success actually look like?

Vague job postings erode trust. And when 65% of employers say they are rewriting job descriptions, it’s clear many organizations are still learning how to articulate outcomes instead of listing generic responsibilities.

In a skills-based hiring market, clarity isn’t optional. It directly impacts talent pipeline quality and candidate experience.

Clients Are Still Learning How to Hire for Skills

For years, hiring managers were trained to scan for pedigree — a bachelor’s degree, recognizable companies, linear career paths.

Now they’re being asked to evaluate:

Project impact
Adaptability
Scenario responses
Demonstrated hard skills and soft skills

That shift sounds simple in theory. In practice, it requires new interview questions, better assessment tools, and a different approach to candidate screening.

The learning curve slows decision-making.

And when decision-making slows, top talent moves on.

The Rise of “Try Before You Buy”

Contract Staffing as Risk Mitigation

With 55% of employers planning contract growth, many organizations are adopting a skills-first approach through flexible hiring models.

Contract roles allow companies to:

Evaluate performance in real time
Manage talent shortages more strategically
Maintain flexibility amid economic uncertainty
Reduce long-term hiring risk

In a volatile job market, this approach feels safer.

Why This Model Can Improve Quality If Done Well

When implemented thoughtfully, contract-first hiring can:

Improve performance visibility
Strengthen onboarding process alignment
Reduce long-term hiring regret
Create clearer evaluation metrics

But it requires structure.

Without strong onboarding, clear job profiling, and defined performance metrics, contract hiring can feel transactional rather than strategic.

The Double-Edged Sword of Skills-Based Hiring

Skills-based hiring can:

Level the playing field beyond the paper ceiling
Expand access for candidates skilled through alternative routes
Improve talent acquisition quality
Support lifelong learning and skills-building paths

But the transition period is messy.

Organizations that remove degree requirements without improving clarity, assessment tools, or candidate screening processes risk slowing themselves down.

The shift demands better job descriptions, stronger recruitment strategy, and clearer alignment between hiring managers and HR professionals.

Why Skills-Based Hiring Is So Revolutionary

Skills-based hiring reflects deeper changes in how organizations evaluate talent and manage the future of work. Removing degree requirements is only the starting point. The real shift happens when companies redefine job profiling, use structured assessment tools, align contract strategy with long-term workforce planning, and invest in internal mobility and workforce training programs.

Without that operational shift, hiring friction continues. With it, organizations build stronger talent pipelines and improve the overall candidate experience.

Skills-based hiring isn’t a trend — it’s an evolution.

But rewriting job postings alone won’t unlock its full value. Organizations that move beyond surface-level changes and build real evaluation infrastructure will hire faster, retain better talent, and reduce long-term hiring regret.

In this transition, the advantage won’t go to the companies that move first.

It will go to the ones that move deliberately.

Looking to hire top-tier Tech, Digital Marketing, or Creative Talent? We can help.

Every year, Mondo helps to fill thousands of open positions nationwide.

Hire Talent

More Reading…

By Sarah Magazzo

Digital Marketing Manager for Mondo National Staffing Agency | AI Drafted & Human Crafted

Skills-Based Hiring Is Growing, But So Is Hiring Friction

What Is Skills-Based Hiring?