Mark Zuckerberg Facebook Scandal: Importance of User Data Privacy
Not long ago, Tech golden boy and Meta CEO, Mark Zuckerberg, became public enemy number one as a result of the highly publicized Facebook user data scandal involving political marketing firm, Cambridge Analytica.
For months, headlines and news covered the firm’s involvement in obtaining and misusing the data of around 50 million users in 2014 and 2015 under false pretenses, breaking Meta — formerly known as Facebook — privacy rules.
Although the politically-motivated element of this user data breach is extremely worrisome, the privacy violations of users and the ongoing conversation about whether our online data is ever really safe are the primary concerns for Tech and Digital Marketing insiders and Meta’s 2.9 billion users.
How did Facebook fail to protect user data?
To understand how the Cambridge Analytica and Facebook user data breach happened, you have to understand Facebook’s history with user data access.
Facebook user data access policies
Back in 2007, Facebook allowed app creators and academics almost free range to the platform and user data, while allowing researchers and marketers to perform independent studies.
Things changed in 2015 when Facebook cited user privacy issues and reduced access to data.
Private user data collected on Facebook was shared
What happened in 2015 to scare Facebook into severely limiting external access to billions of users?
The social media giant learned Aleksander Kogan, a psychology professor at the University of Cambridge, broke data privacy policies when he shared Facebook user data pulled from an approved personality-prediction app called, thisisyourdigitallife, with Cambridge Analytics and others.
Facebook user friend data was also shared
The data included information on people who downloaded the app and nearly 30 different data points on those users’ Facebook friends.
How did they source the data? Users let them by agreeing to the familiar app download screen on Facebook requesting access to their About section, Friends list, and more. (Time to start thinking twice about clicking those checkboxes…)
Cambridge Analytica failed to delete private user data
Facebook ordered the data to be deleted by Cambridge Analytica, which they agreed to do.
Turns out, they didn’t delete it and might have been using it to target users on the platform with political advertisements based on the data since 2015.
What does the Facebook data breach mean?
The Facebook data breach means a number of different things in terms of customer data privacy and cybersecurity that include Facebook access to user data, Facebook changes to privacy policies, Facebook’s attempt to get the stolen data back, and whether or not the damage can be undone.
Facebook access to user data
User data privacy, regardless of where it’s being sourced from, is a widespread, global concern.
However, it is incredibly significant when discussing Facebook considering they have access to one of the largest user data sets in the world given their 2.29 billion user count.
Basically, whatever users voluntarily provide to Facebook or interact with on Facebook becomes part of a user profile that can be accessed by developers and targeted by advertisers who utilize Facebook’s marketing tools.
Facebook changes to privacy policies
While Facebook launches various efforts to try and stem the breaches of their user’s private data and notify the users whose data was obtained by Cambridge Analytica, many experts think it’s too little too late, and the existence of the data ecosystem itself is the issue.
“It’s the whole nature of this ecosystem. The data travels. And once it has spread, there is no way to get it back,” Paul-Olivier Dehaye, a privacy expert and co-founder of PersonalData.IO, told reporters.
The Facebook user data damage can’t be undone
And Zuckerberg, to an extent, agrees. He told Wired the data Cambridge Analytica obtained “wasn’t watermarked in any way,” meaning it could’ve been shared with others.
And Zuckerberg went on to say that if Kogan had passed on some type of derivative of the data based on his own scoring system, Facebook wouldn’t have known or been able to find it.
Facebook efforts to get leaked user data back
The only solution available to Facebook was to try and get the leaked data back by launching an investigation into the tens of thousands of apps that had collected large amounts of user data.
Auditors analyzed the suspected servers and interrogated businesses about their practices.
But even Zuckerberg admitted, “Like any security precaution, it’s not that this is a bulletproof solve.”
He specified one process by itself won’t be able to find “every single thing” but he hopes it will be a strong deterrent and “make it a lot harder for anybody to misuse the data.”
What the Facebook scandal means for digital marketers
This Facebook user data scandal will likely have a significant impact on today’s Digital Marketing experts that rely on the platform for highly personalized (and profitable) online campaigns through precision marketing. From assessing customer trust to navigating tightened restrictions, digital marketers will have to reassess their methods.
Facebook scandal driving ad spend
With regulation of the social platform being called for by government officials, the public, and even Zuckerberg himself, marketers are waiting to see if Facebook changes the way it uses data or how its ad products work before making decisions about whether marketing on the platform is still profitable.
A potential change of limiting access to third-party measurement on the platform could impact how much brands are willing to pay for ads, which is the core revenue-generating source for Facebook.
Facebook scandal affecting trust
However, analyzing and reevaluating how a business acquires and processes personal data should now be at the top of every marketer’s to-do list.
As consumer trust in the practices of Big Tech continues to lessen and the demand for enhanced security of private user data increases, the impact will be felt across all industries that rely on Facebook and Google, the two most popular and effective sites in the world, for ads, online presence, and exposure to new audiences.
Marketers, specifically, must look at how they use Facebook user data and evaluate which tactics still provide the reach they need, without the liability that now comes with marketing on the platform.
Facebook scandal leads to boycotts
Considering the global reach of Facebook, it’s likely that even the addition of regulation and data policy changes won’t force Marketers to look elsewhere since no other website comes close to offering the in-depth, user-specific data it provides.
Instead, it’s likely innovative Marketers will benefit most by collaborating with websites like Facebook and Google to work toward positive change rather than joining the current #DeleteFacebook boycott.
Digital marketing after the Facebook scandal
If you lack the latest Marketing expertise on your team to navigate the ongoing changes to online marketing campaigns, contact Mondo today.
We have exclusive access to the latest high-end, niche Digital Marketing experts you need now more than ever to ensure your strategies comply with future regulations, while still providing you with the data you need to drive website clicks and increase revenue.
Looking to hire top-tier Tech, Digital Marketing, or Creative Talent? We can help.
Every year, Mondo helps to fill over 2,000 open positions nationwide.
More articles about hiring strategies & industry trends:
- Hiring Advice: Staffing & Employment Trends For 2023
- Influencer Marketing in 2023: What to Expect & Jobs to Hire
- Hiring Tips for Business Owners: Signs It’s Time to Hire a Digital Marketer
- UX Designers: Job Description, Salary & Career Path
- Best Remote STEM Jobs, with Salary Ranges
- 7 Things to Never Say to a Recruiter When Looking for a Job